Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

RE: st: -generate- and run time contingencies


From   "David Harrison" <david.harrison@icnarc.org>
To   <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu>
Subject   RE: st: -generate- and run time contingencies
Date   Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:17:30 -0000

Is there anything wrong with the following?

gen x = .8 + .2*uniform() 

Or am I missing the point?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Richard
Williams
Sent: 30 January 2006 16:37
To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Cc: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: st: -generate- and run time contingencies

At 11:15 AM 1/30/2006, n j cox wrote:
>// not tested, but simplified
>gen x = uniform()
>capture assert x >= 0.8
>
>while _rc {
>         replace x = cond(x < 0.8, uniform(), x)
>         capture assert x >= 0.8
>}

That works too.  It seemed a little quicker but I didn't time it.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/